RFQ Checklist
- Cycle profile and target takt time
- Accuracy / repeatability acceptance threshold
- Protocol and power architecture details
- Prototype quantity and commercialization timeline
← Back to Products
Compact Planetary Joint Module
Compact planetary-reducer joint module balancing torque density, response speed, and cost for collaborative and mobile robot applications.
Target Buyer:Best for teams balancing performance, compactness, and scalable procurement economics.
Capability Highlights
- Balanced cost-to-performance architecture
- Compact footprint for distributed multi-axis systems
- Good dynamic response for frequent acceleration changes
Typical Applications
- Collaborative robot joints
- AGV/AMR manipulator modules
- Educational and service robots
Engineering Focus
- Backlash allowance by end-effector precision requirement
- Continuous thermal operation at medium-load duty
- Controller and communication stack compatibility
Key Evaluation Matrix
| Metric | Typical Range | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Torque Density | Mid-to-high for compact class | Affects payload capability while preserving envelope constraints. |
| Response Bandwidth | Application dependent | Impacts smoothness and stability during rapid trajectory updates. |
Technical Specification Baseline
Use this baseline for first-pass engineering comparison before requesting model-specific files.
| Field | Baseline Value | Interpretation Note |
|---|---|---|
| Supply Voltage | 24-48V DC | Matched to collaborative/mobile robot stack. |
| Continuous / Peak Torque | Compact planetary class | Balanced by speed response and precision target. |
| Max Speed (No-load reference) | High dynamic response class | Final value depends on control mode and payload. |
| Backlash Class | Application-specific | Tolerance stack-up reviewed in pre-RFQ stage. |
| Communication | EtherCAT / CAN options | Integration manual provided by project scope. |
Performance Evidence
Detailed torque-speed envelopes and dynamic response evidence are provided in model-level engineering packages. Interpretation is tied to duty cycle, thermal constraints, and interface assumptions.
- Torque-speed boundary interpretation is valid only with matched ambient and duty assumptions.
- Response stability conclusions require controller and protocol scope alignment.
- Final acceptance uses customer-approved sample validation criteria.
Risk Controls
- Precision target incompatible with backlash class: Run pre-RFQ tolerance stack-up and upgrade to harmonic path when required.
- Protocol mismatch with host controller: Freeze communication requirements before sample BOM lock.
Interface Drawings and Engineering Files
Request model-level STEP files and datasheets through the engineering resource workflow to ensure revision consistency.
Product Gallery
Compliance Trust Signals
- CE / RoHS support scope available by project baseline.
- Quality-system evidence aligned to RFQ document checklist.
- Functional safety assumption alignment documented during integration planning.
Buyer FAQ
Is this suitable for multi-axis collaborative robots?
Yes. It is frequently selected for compact multi-axis architectures with moderate payload requirements.
Can we start from prototype and scale later?
Yes. We support prototype-to-mass-production transition with revision traceability.
Related Resources
Engineering RFQ Email
Include torque-speed targets, annual volume, and timeline.
Lead Robotics Engineer
+86 18857971991
Direct technical conversation with our lead robotics engineer.